Articles Posted in Commercial Litigation

“VALUABLE CONSIDERATION” REQUIRED TO ENFORCE NON-COMPETE AGREEMENT DESPITE COMPLIANCE WITH PENNSYLVANIA UNIFORM WRITTEN OBLIGATIONS ACT
H. Adam Shapiro

The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently examined what impact, if any, the Pennsylvania Uniform Written Obligations ACT (PUWOA) has on an employment agreement that contained a covenant not to compete entered into after the employee started working with the employer. The short answer is – no effect at all. First a little background is in order.…

Continue reading ›
DO I NEED TO FILE AN S ELECTION IN PENNSYLVANIA – LEGAL RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN: A FOOL AND HIS MONEY ARE SOON PARTED
H. Adam Shapiro

These are dangerous times to be starting your new business. The economy is tight, money is not readily available and your legal budget is next to nil. You’ve heard that you need to incorporate to protect your family assets and you keep hearing on the radio that you don’t need a lawyer. In fact, you…

Continue reading ›
WHISTLEBLOWER AWARDS IN EXCESS OF $14 MILLION IN 2013
H. Adam Shapiro

The SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower (OWB) awarded individuals over $14 million in 2013 for their “significant and original contributions” to successful enforcement of the securities laws. The OWB is now in its 3rd full year and the number of tips and complaints is trending upward. OWB reports that it received 3,001 tips and complaint…

Continue reading ›
SEC ENTERS INTO FIRST DEFERRED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT WITH INDIVIDUAL
H. Adam Shapiro

Late last year the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had entered into its first deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with an individual who worked in an administrative capacity at a large hedge fund. The DPA allowed the SEC to successfully go after hedge fund manager Berton Hochfield who reportedly stole more than 1.5 million…

Continue reading ›
SEC BEING INVESTIGATED (AGAIN) FOR IMPROPER TRADING
H. Adam Shapiro

Well this doesn’t happen every day – or does it? The SEC finds itself being investigated for improper financial holdings. According to a November 2013 Reuters post, federal prosecutors and the office of the inspector general of the SEC contacted employees in the SEC’s New York office about trading in companies that are under SEC…

Continue reading ›
SEC NOW REQUIRES ADMISSION OF WRONGDOING IN SETTLEMENTS OF “EGREGIOUS” CASES
H. Adam Shapiro

In the past the Securities and Exchange Commission had allowed defendants to settle civil and administrative claims brought by the SEC without requiring defendants to admit or deny liability. However, there has been a change of policy with the recent appointment of the new SEC Chair Mary Jo White. Now, in “egregious” cases, the SEC…

Continue reading ›
“INSTRUMENT UNDER SEAL” – THESE THREE WORDS REALLY DO MATTER
H. Adam Shapiro

Ever wonder what an “instrument under seal” is? When the word [SEAL] is placed next to the signature block at the end of the written guaranty or loan agreement, does it have any impact? The answer is a big YES. Earlier this summer, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court confirmed what we have always told our clients…

Continue reading ›
FEDERAL JUDGE BANS EXPERT TESTIMONY IN INSURANCE CASE – JURY CAN RELY UPON THEIR GENERAL KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE
H. Adam Shapiro

For the second time in the last year a judge has precluded expert testimony regarding bath faith claims asserted against insurance companies. The most recent case out of the Western District of Pennsylvania involved a motor vehicle accident where the insurance company offered $13,000 on a policy with a $300,000 limit. In response to the…

Continue reading ›
New Proposals to Fight Patent Trolls
H. Adam Shapiro

New proposals coming from the White House this week should give small business owners hope for relief from costly patent troll litigation. This type of lawsuit has been an increasingly expensive threat to small businesses, most of which never imaged they’ll be involved in patent litigation. The common perception is patent disputes are for manufacturers…

Continue reading ›
INITIAL OFFER LETTER OF EMPLOYMENT ALMOST INVALIDATES RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
H. Adam Shapiro

On May 29, 2013, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided an interesting case regarding how an initial offer letter to a prospective employee can potentially impact a restrictive covenant in an employee’s employment agreement. Before discussing this case, we need a very brief summary regarding what courts look to when deciding whether to enforce a restrictive…

Continue reading ›

Client Reviews

Adam has been my corporate attorney for over 10 years. He is extremely professional and knowledgeable. He efficiently moves through the judicial system and always keeps the best interest of his client in the foreground.

Janet

We hired Adam to represent us for a patent dispute. He was excellent from the very beginning. He was thorough, detailed, honest, forthright, succinct, and available to us for questions at all times. Needless to say he achieved the best outcome we could have hoped for, and I cannot recommend him...

Matt

I just recently sold my company and the firm of Danziger Shapiro held up the legal end of the transaction. Adam Shapiro left no rock unturned to protect my interests. The closing did not proceed as smoothly as we had hoped, but Adam was supportive through the entire process. They have been my legal...

J.H.

Contact Us

  1. 1 Over 20 Years of Experience
  2. 2 Successful and Creative Results
  3. 3 Industry-Specific Knowledge
Fill out the contact form or call us at (215) 545-4830 to schedule your consultation.

Leave Us a Message